It's different when someone is in control and not afraid of a blank page. Then he can think for a while. A calm person may be tempted to ask a question to the topic. A good question stimulates thinking and makes the reader get caught up in the author's reasoning. In other word...
It's different when someone is in control and not afraid of a blank page. Then he can think for a while. A calm person may be tempted to ask a question to the topic. A good question stimulates thinking and makes the reader get caught up in the author's reasoning. In other words, the examiner is interested in what kind of answer the high school graduate will give. Is it the same as his or her answer, or quite different? He reads not because he has to, but because he is curious to see what the young author has come up with. Making the cheap college essay writing service examiner curious about his/her baccalaureate paper is half the battle.
The question does not have to be one. Several can be posed. For example, for the above topic, it would be expedient to write such a beginning: How did E. Orzeszkowa and K. K. Baczynski depicted the past in their works? Were their reflections on the memory of the nation similar or different? These are the simplest questions (How...?, In what way...?, Did...?), but after all, you can start with why (e.g. "Why are we comparing E. Orzeszkowa, a positivist writer, with a representative of the Kolumb generation, K. K. Baczyński? What do these authors have in common?") or in yet another way, e.g. "Thanks to what do we remember the past and care about the memory of the nation? Who stimulates us to reflect on Polish history?".
Ambitious students do not like to start their work with questions because they consider them trivial. Indeed, it is difficult to soar to the heights of the Alps at the matriculation exam and dazzle the examiner with a clever question. One has to accept that the questions in the introduction have to be reasonably straightforward. Their aim is not to win a Polish speech master's competition, but simply to arouse the examiner's interest, to win his sympathy. Simple tricks are best for this, e.g. "What can the reader think of the Polish past when comparing Orzeszkowa's novella and Baczynski's poem? What kind of Poland did these writers portray? What images of the homeland did they convey to the readers of their works? What can we think about this today?"
The boxer in the ring
Another school of writing says that the beginning of an essay should be as strong as a heavyweight boxer's punch. The best for this are short sentences that resemble a fist fighter's punches, e.g. "Sand wet with blood, land full of corpses, forests filled with graves. These are typical images of the past in Polish literature. Partitions, uprisings, occupation. The dying of an insurgent, the death of a partisan, a grave and a cross, victory and defeat. The novella Gloria victis, the poem Mazowsze. Orzeszkowa and Baczyński - patriotic writers." Further on, you can write in a more colloquial style, but in an introduction in this style you should be struck by numerous series of short sentences or even by equivalences alone. Such a beginning suits essays with painful, difficult, serious themes. It is less suitable for papers with lighter topics.